We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.

Arrests at Suspect’s Residence

In this article we will cover warrant arrests and general rules of consent.  Exigent circumstances will be covered in a subsequent article. 



In People v. Ramey (1976) 16 Cal.3d 263, the California Supreme Court ruled that an arrest within a suspect’s home without an arrest warrant is per se unreasonable.  But, a warrantless probable cause arrest in a public place remains reasonable.  (United States v. Watson (1976) 423 U.S. 411.) 


SUSPECT in driveway of suspect’s residence? Public place, no warrant required.

SUSPECT steps outside the residence at officer’s request or demand? Public place, no warrant required.   Does not matter if the officer asks or demands the suspect come out, as long as suspect acquiesces to the demand that he or she exit the residence and does exit, no warrant is necessary. 

           SUSPECT is at doorway of residence?  Public place, no warrant required.  The United States Supreme court in U.S. v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38 has ruled a warrantless arrest initiated  on the arrestee’s doorstep remains lawful even if the arrestee retreats inside the home before being physically taken into custody. 



           Remember, an arrest warrant is NOT a search warrant. However, an officer authorized to enter and search a home pursuant to a search warrant may also lawfully make a probable cause arrest inside the house being searched – no separate arrest warrant is needed.  Contraband seen in plain view may also be seized.  In that instance, STOP and get a SEARCH WARRANT. 




California courts have held  “A police entry into a residence is proper when the circumstances justify a good faith reasonable belief that a person on the premises has the authority to and does consent to such entry.”  Entry to make arrest without an arrest warrant can also be upheld even though the person consenting to the entry is not the suspect about to be arrested.  Indeed, unless the suspect is present and objecting, a co-tenant can give consent to an officer’s entry. 

Entry into a residence is valid when done with the occupant’s consent.  Such consent can be expressed by actions, such as stepping aside and gesturing with an arm, as well as by words. Merely opening the door and stepping aside has been held to be sufficient manifestation of consent. 



When asking for consent to enter it is important to ascertain whether the person has sufficient control and access to the residence to give valid consent. An overnight guest, a transient occupant or a person whose contact with the location is unclear, may not provide for valid consent to enter.  When in doubt, get an arrest warrant, they do not expire and provide legal protection for subsequent actions.  

  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department
  • This was, by far, one of the most useful classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department
  • Your instructional style is engaging and your tag-team style is highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator
  • Your class has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department
  • ...Provides useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS
  • The information that they have presented is highly relevant to my job, and was presented in a manner that was highly organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin
  • Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to attend the Interview and Interrogation training presented by Paul Francois and Enrique Garcia.

    —Todd Almason, Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office
  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department
  • You two are an effective teaching team, and your presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda
  • Your class gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department