We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.
  • Celebrating 20 Years of Training Excellence 2004-2024

Arrests at Suspect’s Residence

In this article we will cover warrant arrests and general rules of consent.  Exigent circumstances will be covered in a subsequent article. 



In People v. Ramey (1976) 16 Cal.3d 263, the California Supreme Court ruled that an arrest within a suspect’s home without an arrest warrant is per se unreasonable.  But, a warrantless probable cause arrest in a public place remains reasonable.  (United States v. Watson (1976) 423 U.S. 411.) 


SUSPECT in driveway of suspect’s residence? Public place, no warrant required.

SUSPECT steps outside the residence at officer’s request or demand? Public place, no warrant required.   Does not matter if the officer asks or demands the suspect come out, as long as suspect acquiesces to the demand that he or she exit the residence and does exit, no warrant is necessary. 

           SUSPECT is at doorway of residence?  Public place, no warrant required.  The United States Supreme court in U.S. v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38 has ruled a warrantless arrest initiated  on the arrestee’s doorstep remains lawful even if the arrestee retreats inside the home before being physically taken into custody. 



           Remember, an arrest warrant is NOT a search warrant. However, an officer authorized to enter and search a home pursuant to a search warrant may also lawfully make a probable cause arrest inside the house being searched – no separate arrest warrant is needed.  Contraband seen in plain view may also be seized.  In that instance, STOP and get a SEARCH WARRANT. 




California courts have held  “A police entry into a residence is proper when the circumstances justify a good faith reasonable belief that a person on the premises has the authority to and does consent to such entry.”  Entry to make arrest without an arrest warrant can also be upheld even though the person consenting to the entry is not the suspect about to be arrested.  Indeed, unless the suspect is present and objecting, a co-tenant can give consent to an officer’s entry. 

Entry into a residence is valid when done with the occupant’s consent.  Such consent can be expressed by actions, such as stepping aside and gesturing with an arm, as well as by words. Merely opening the door and stepping aside has been held to be sufficient manifestation of consent. 



When asking for consent to enter it is important to ascertain whether the person has sufficient control and access to the residence to give valid consent. An overnight guest, a transient occupant or a person whose contact with the location is unclear, may not provide for valid consent to enter.  When in doubt, get an arrest warrant, they do not expire and provide legal protection for subsequent actions.  

  • The information presented was highly relevant to my job and was presented in a manner that was organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin
  • Instructional style is engaging and highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator
  • Your training gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department
  • This was, by far and away the best training I have received in 15 plus years of Law Enforcement. The instructors are experienced, engaging, articulate, and very entertaining. I will be recommending this training to multiple agencies.

    —Mark Paynter, Oregon DOC
  • It not often that you go to a training that you really, really want to pay attention to. Because of the high quality information and style of presentation, I knew that if I looked away I was going to miss out.

    —Quinten Graves, Oregon State Police
  • This training provided the useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS
  • This training by far has been the most informative and most effective I've attended. The instructors engaged the students in a manner that made me want to speak my opinion, ask questions, and participate.

    —Julio Ibarra, Merced County Sheriff’s Office
  • Effective teaching teams! The presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda
  • This was, by far, one of the most useful training classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department
  • Incredible training with amazing real world instruction. I have been taking law enforcement classes for over 30 years and by far this is the best presented and most useful.

    —Det. Brian Dale, Portland Police Bureau
  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department
  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department
  • Your training has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department