We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.
  • Celebrating 20 Years of Training Excellence 2004-2024

Cognitive Interview Steps

Last month, we reviewed the steps of the Free Format Interview. As promised, we would now like to turn to a more complex interviewing technique – The Cognitive Interview. This is very helpful in eliciting more detailed information from people involved in high profile cases.

The Cognitive Interview was developed after investigators were challenged in court for using forensic hypnosis due to issues pertaining to suggestibility. Forensic Hypnosis does not pass the “Frye Test” as established by case law. As an alternative, psychologists created the Cognitive Interview as a Memory Enhancement Tool for investigative interviewing.

Let’s review the steps. Just as with the Free Format Interview, begin with a professional opening, establish rapport, and advise the subject that you wish to conduct a “special” type of interview. Remind them that you will be there with them for quite a while so that you can conduct a thorough interview. This case is important to you and you want to obtain as much detail as possible.

Step 1: Ensure completeness/privacy
• Request that they tell you everything, no matter how minor
• Advise them that they may mention anything that comes to mind, even if out of context or chronological order
• Ensure complete privacy throughout the interview
• Ask the subject to face a blank wall (or close their eyes) as this will help them recall specifics about the incident

Step 2: Reconstruct all aspects of the scene “mentally”
• Use below-listed questions to help them visualize who, what, where, when, why and how:
   ᅳ Time of day, day of week
   ᅳ General location, environment
   ᅳ Specific location, distances
   ᅳ Lighting, weather conditions
   ᅳ Visual impairments (glasses, shrubs, etc.)
   ᅳ Activity, thoughts before, during and after the event
   ᅳ Sounds, odors, emotions felt

Step 3: Conduct a Free-Format interview
• Narrative Statement – listen and watch as subject tells their entire “story”
• First Paraphrase – paraphrase subject’s narrative statement, fill in holes
• Who-What-Where-When-Why- How – prepared/new questions, details
• Second Paraphrase – review the statement and make corrections as necessary
NOTE: Refer to the TDC Tip article on Free-Format Interview for further information.

Step 4: Reverse order
• Have subject recall his/her statement in reverse chronological order
   o This may assist the subject in recalling additional details he/she otherwise may not remember
   o The truthful subject will most likely cooperate with this request, while the deceptive subject will most likely show some resistance

Step 5: Change perspective
• Have the witness mentally put themselves in the shoes of someone else, or put themselves in a different area of the scene and tell you what happened
   o For example: If the witness was standing at the front of the convenience store during an armed robbery, ask them to place themselves at the rear of the store and to tell you what they would have seen from that perspective.
     – This may help them recall new details about the incident such as: a better physical or clothing description of the suspect’s back; accomplices and associated vehicles waiting outside the store; or potential witnesses that may yield follow-up information
So when might an investigator opt to use the Cognitive Interview technique instead of the simpler (and shorter) Free Format Interview? The Cognitive Interview would be a good choice if your subject is having difficulty remembering details of the incident because they were traumatized or intoxicated at the time or the investigation is high profile in nature. Remember that this technique requires considerably more time, so be sure to allow for that and be patient.

  • The information presented was highly relevant to my job and was presented in a manner that was organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin
  • Instructional style is engaging and highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator
  • Your training has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department
  • Incredible training with amazing real world instruction. I have been taking law enforcement classes for over 30 years and by far this is the best presented and most useful.

    —Det. Brian Dale, Portland Police Bureau
  • This training provided the useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS
  • It not often that you go to a training that you really, really want to pay attention to. Because of the high quality information and style of presentation, I knew that if I looked away I was going to miss out.

    —Quinten Graves, Oregon State Police
  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department
  • This was, by far and away the best training I have received in 15 plus years of Law Enforcement. The instructors are experienced, engaging, articulate, and very entertaining. I will be recommending this training to multiple agencies.

    —Mark Paynter, Oregon DOC
  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department
  • Your training gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department
  • This was, by far, one of the most useful training classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department
  • Effective teaching teams! The presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda
  • This training by far has been the most informative and most effective I've attended. The instructors engaged the students in a manner that made me want to speak my opinion, ask questions, and participate.

    —Julio Ibarra, Merced County Sheriff’s Office