SKIP TO CONTENT
We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.
  • Celebrating 20 Years of Training Excellence 2004-2024

CONTAINING YOUR ENTHUSIASM – Searches of Containers

As a general rule with all things search and seizure, get a warrant, as required by the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution. However, also like all things search and seizure, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. Several legal theories justify the warrantless search of a container, including incident to arrest, with probable cause, and at the time of booking. Let’s look at these exceptions.

Searching containers in a vehicle became a bit more complicated after Arizona v. Gant (2009) when the US Supreme Court narrowed what could be searched incident to arrest in a vehicle stop. Remember, the law used to allow for the search of the passenger compartment and all its containers incident to arrest without probable cause or even reasonable suspicion. After Gant, a warrantless, suspicionless search of a vehicle, including the containers therein, incident to arrest is lawful only when the arrestee is unsecured and within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search. However, the exception to this is when it is reasonable to believe evidence relevant to the crime of arrest might be found in the car. If such evidence can be found in a container, then a warrantless search of the container is okay.  Arresting a person for driving while under the influence of a controlled substance supplies the necessary reasonable suspicion for believing evidence relevant to the crime of arrest might be in the vehicle and containers therein. The presence of drug paraphernalia or drugs corroborates that the driver was in fact under the influence of a controlled substance.

If an officer has probable cause to believe there is contraband or other seizable items in a car, the officer may make a warrantless search anywhere a warrant would authorize, including closed containers inside the car. However, the scope is defined by the object of the search and the places in which there is probable cause to believe that it may be found. If an officer seeking a search warrant would have been able to articulate to a magistrate the probable cause for the warrant to search the container, then the officer can search containers in the vehicle without a warrant. This includes a closed container belonging to a passenger even if the passenger is not arrested.  For example, a suspect fled in his car and was arrested with cash and crack cocaine on his person. This was sufficient probable cause to perform a warrantless search of the car, including the passenger’s purse inside the car.

Lastly, a further exception to the warrant requirement is property in the possession of or under control of a suspect who is booked into custody. At the time of booking, police can inspect the suspect’s possessions to determine whether the property was stolen, used in the commission of a crime, constitutes or holds contraband, or to inventory for return to the suspect when released from custody. Therefore, at the time of booking, officers can search closed container on the suspect’s person without a warrant.

What does this mean for you? Be able to articulate how your search for items relates to the crime for which the suspect was arrested or be able to articulate probable cause for the search of the container. Is a cell phone a container? To be discussed next time!

 

  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department
  • Incredible training with amazing real world instruction. I have been taking law enforcement classes for over 30 years and by far this is the best presented and most useful.

    —Det. Brian Dale, Portland Police Bureau
  • This training provided the useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS
  • This training by far has been the most informative and most effective I've attended. The instructors engaged the students in a manner that made me want to speak my opinion, ask questions, and participate.

    —Julio Ibarra, Merced County Sheriff’s Office
  • Instructional style is engaging and highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator
  • This was, by far and away the best training I have received in 15 plus years of Law Enforcement. The instructors are experienced, engaging, articulate, and very entertaining. I will be recommending this training to multiple agencies.

    —Mark Paynter, Oregon DOC
  • The information presented was highly relevant to my job and was presented in a manner that was organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin
  • Effective teaching teams! The presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda
  • Your training gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department
  • It not often that you go to a training that you really, really want to pay attention to. Because of the high quality information and style of presentation, I knew that if I looked away I was going to miss out.

    —Quinten Graves, Oregon State Police
  • This was, by far, one of the most useful training classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department
  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department
  • Your training has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department