SKIP TO CONTENT
We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.
  • Most TDC training courses have resumed being held in person (check course page for updates)

Crimes Regarding Community Property

The writer happened to be in a domestic violence department a couple of weeks ago and there was argument in a motion regarding whether a spouse could be convicted of damaging community property. Community property being property acquired during a marriage that belongs to both spouses equally. It was an interesting argument until such time as the knowledgeable young prosecutor cited actual case law to support the position that “yes” there can be crimes against community property. Officers well versed in the law should take care to familiarize themselves with those situations. Some examples are below.

It is important to remember if you go out to a domestic violence call and there is destruction of property, the general rule is that each community property owner has an equal ownership interest in the co-owned property. The law provides that damage or destruction of property by the other marital partner is prohibited. For instance, a spouse may be held criminally liable for the destruction of a husband’s bicycle purchased during the marriage. There is also a case where a husband was convicted of felony vandalism when he did damage to the home furnishings when the wife threw him out of the house.

A spouse may also be liable for the theft of community property, such as, money, a car, jewelry, arson etc. Being a spouse is not a defense to theft or vandalism of community assets and will provide probable cause to arrest.

A spouse may also be liable for burglary. One case found that a spouse who left the home for a night could be found guilty of burglary when he came back and committed corporal injury on his spouse. Another found that a defendant could be convicted of burglary in the process of committing a spousal rape when he entered the home after he had lived elsewhere. Another case found that a husband who was living elsewhere who entered the residence without consent and took community property, committed vandalism and spousal abuse could be convicted of burglary.

Again, when the case law is examined, it is clear that the question of whether an individual can commit crimes regarding community property becomes, as it were, married with the answer, yes.

 

 

  • This training provided the useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS
  • Incredible training with amazing real world instruction. I have been taking law enforcement classes for over 30 years and by far this is the best presented and most useful.

    —Det. Brian Dale, Portland Police Bureau
  • Your training has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department
  • Instructional style is engaging and highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator
  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department
  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department
  • Your training gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department
  • This was, by far, one of the most useful training classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department
  • Effective teaching teams! The presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda
  • It not often that you go to a training that you really, really want to pay attention to. Because of the high quality information and style of presentation, I knew that if I looked away I was going to miss out.

    —Quinten Graves, Oregon State Police
  • The information presented was highly relevant to my job and was presented in a manner that was organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin