We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.

Private Search

An interesting article about a child pornography prosecution in Los Angeles was published last week and it raises the issue of when does someone become a government “agent.”  It becomes important when officers are asking the public to take an action or using evidence discovered by the public to further an investigation. 

Best Buy has a central computer repair location in Kentucky.  Technicians work to retrieve data on disabled or damaged hard drives sent there from everywhere in the country.  Prior to sending the hard drive, the local Best Buy store has the customer sign a waiver that states in part, “authorities will be notified if child pornography is discovered on the hard drive.”  In recent years multiple workers have notified the FBI when they see signs of child pornography and they get paid for their information.

The defendant here gave his hard drive to a local Best Buy in Los Angeles. The hard drive was sent to Kentucky. At the repair location, it turns out that eight technicians operated as confidential informants to the FBI.  All received payments for their information. 

It is clear that a private search is legal. The defendant authorized it and it is a private search. At what point does a civilian become a government agent?

Multiple cases have upheld civilian searches turning over information to law enforcement.  United States v. Hall, 142 F.3d 988, 993 (7th Cir. 1998)

If you are given information from a civilian, a wife, a friend, a child, a computer repairman, all of whom are not government agents, the receipt of that information is legal.  Look at one or two images and get a warrant.  That is the safest procedure.  There are cases which say you may search everywhere the civilian did but why take a chance?  The safe route is to briefly look at the evidence and then use probable cause to obtain a warrant. 

What if the civilian is judged a government agent?  In other words, someone working at the direction of or in concert with, law enforcement?  You need to ask questions; what is the scope of the consent to the civilian?; what type of access does the civilian have?; are there any limitations on the consent they were given to control the item of location?  The court will look in detail at the relationship between the civilian and the suspect.  You need to ask detailed questions about what the scope of consent is, whether the civilian is taking direction from law enforcement, and whether the civilian intended to assist law enforcement based upon some other inducement. 

The bottom line is, when dealing with civilians who are giving you consent or who have performed a private search, ask a lot of questions and document them in your offense report.  The more answers we have up front, the more likely it is that our evidence can be used at trial. Stay safe. 





  • Your class gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department
  • The information that they have presented is highly relevant to my job, and was presented in a manner that was highly organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin
  • Your class has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department
  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department
  • This was, by far, one of the most useful classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department
  • Your instructional style is engaging and your tag-team style is highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator
  • Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to attend the Interview and Interrogation training presented by Paul Francois and Enrique Garcia.

    —Todd Almason, Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office
  • You two are an effective teaching team, and your presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda
  • ...Provides useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS
  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department