We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.
  • Celebrating 20 Years of Training Excellence 2004-2024

Public Relations v. Crisis Communications

Over the last decade, most law enforcement agencies have come to realize the importance of communicating with the public. The majority of police departments work with the media, have their own websites, and many are utilizing social media to get their messages out.

However, when crisis hits … like Winston Churchill said, “A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on” … immediate, concise, and truthful communication becomes vital. That crisis can be anything from a natural disaster or officer malfeasance allegation, to terrorism concerns or a crime wave, like the arsons that occurred in Los Angeles County right around New Year’s.

The most obvious difference between day-to-day public relations and crisis communications is the level of interest. There will be an exaggerated response by the media and the public to a crisis. Your job may be to quell rumor, calm a panicked public, and explain a complex situation all at once. It’s important to remember that crises are “money stories” for the media … interest will be intense, pressure will be severe, and the need to “feed the beast” overwhelming. In today’s ‘no news cycle’ world, the pressure on your agency for information will be never-ending. Be prepared to think on your feet.

During a crisis if you are indeed the lead agency, keep in mind your job is to “keep the main thing, the main thing.” After an F-2 tornado ravaged downtown Atlanta in 2008, the media ran the story non-stop for 72 hours. While the media were asking premature questions about the amount of damage and cost to the city, it was the Atlanta Police Department’s job to keep the media on-point – messaging about public safety, traffic issues, and clean-up.

That leads to the second job of an agency at the head of a crisis: keep messages timely. At the onset of an incident, you may have to provide 15, 30, or 60 minute updates. Take control of the message right away by using your department’s social media site as the go-to place for new information. If you don’t provide a constant stream of information when it becomes available, and is releasable to the public, the media and your community will go elsewhere for information – and there’s a good chance you will then be spending your limited resources correcting misconceptions and rumors. Even if there is no update, letting the public know “we have nothing more to add right now, but we will have another update for you in 15 minutes” is a great strategy that lets the media and public know you respect their need for information and are doing everything possible to provide it in a timely fashion.

Third, keep messages simple. Twitter has both pros and cons … but it forces one to think in 140 character ‘sound bites’ – this actually helps departments create simple and easy to follow messages. Remember, during crisis, the media and public experience tunnel vision, just as officers may when involved in a shooting. Simple, active-voice, positive messages such as: “stay inside”, “stay home”, or “give blood” resonate. Messages that tell people what NOT to do, can sometimes be confusing, and leave the public asking, “OK, what SHOULD I do?”

While “inform, engage, empower” is the foundation of a strong communication strategy, in crisis it is key. People feel helpless in crisis, and look to the authorities for information and what they can do. The LA County Sheriff did a terrific job during the arsons around the New Year – telling people to “keep your lights on outside at night” and “if you see something, say something”. Simple messages of diligence led to the speedy arrest of a suspect and the calming of an entire county that was reassured their police were on the job and that the community was not helpless.

With all this said, these rules of communicating in crisis won’t work if your agency has not developed a level of trust with your community. If you haven’t laid the ground-work of trust before a crisis, it will be difficult to be seen as a credible source for information during one. There are numerous steps you can take before, during, and after a crisis to build trust in a community. Take those steps now to help prepare for that day … because whether you prepare or not, “that day” will come!

Judy Pal has managed media, communications and public affairs for police in both Canada and in the United States. In addition, she has provided media training, crisis communications, internal communications and image development seminars to police, fire and other first-responders across North America.


  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department
  • Your training has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department
  • This was, by far, one of the most useful training classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department
  • It not often that you go to a training that you really, really want to pay attention to. Because of the high quality information and style of presentation, I knew that if I looked away I was going to miss out.

    —Quinten Graves, Oregon State Police
  • Effective teaching teams! The presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda
  • This training by far has been the most informative and most effective I've attended. The instructors engaged the students in a manner that made me want to speak my opinion, ask questions, and participate.

    —Julio Ibarra, Merced County Sheriff’s Office
  • Incredible training with amazing real world instruction. I have been taking law enforcement classes for over 30 years and by far this is the best presented and most useful.

    —Det. Brian Dale, Portland Police Bureau
  • The information presented was highly relevant to my job and was presented in a manner that was organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin
  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department
  • Instructional style is engaging and highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator
  • This was, by far and away the best training I have received in 15 plus years of Law Enforcement. The instructors are experienced, engaging, articulate, and very entertaining. I will be recommending this training to multiple agencies.

    —Mark Paynter, Oregon DOC
  • This training provided the useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS
  • Your training gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department