We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.
  • Celebrating 20 Years of Training Excellence 2004-2024

Routine Booking Questions of Gangsters


As gang crime becomes more prevalent, identifying gangsters becomes more important. Field interviews, interviews with other gangsters, and of course, criminal conduct, can all be used in subsequent prosecutions of gangsters. Jail classification is also used and is excellent information for a jury. First, jail classification information is important for the jury because of its trustworthy nature. No gangster is going to classify as a sureno when he is a norteno. Second, classification information also gives our jurors, who are not steeped in the gang culture, insight into our gangster’s behavior—that he has been to jail.

A new case in California recently took up the issue of whether routine booking questions are inside or outside of Miranda.

As a general rule, administrative booking questions do not violate Miranda because they do not call for incriminating responses. But, the defendant in a new case argued that gang classification questions are by their very nature incriminating.

In People v. Gomez, 2011 DJDAR 38376, Gomez was arrested along with three other men after they beat a man outside the man’s apartment, flashed gang signs, and carjacked his truck.

About two miles away the four men were detained, the victim did an in field show up and the men were arrested. The men were arrested by a city police officer and they were transported to jail.

At the jail, a deputy sheriff working in classification asked Gomez his name, dob, and whether he had any gang affiliations. He was asked which gang and he stated Arlanza. Gomez was then asked whether he was an active member, associate or drop out. He said he was active.

At trial, the statements to the deputy at classification were used to prove that Gomez was an active gang participant.


The deputy questioning Gomez did not obtain a Miranda waiver before the booking questions. As stated above, as a general rule, basic information gathered at booking is not subject to Miranda. Gomez argued that the gang questions were calling for incriminating responses, admitting to being an active gang member, and were therefore subject to Miranda and should have been excluded from his trial.

The sheriff’s deputy testified that he asked the questions for classification issues and not for investigative purposes.


The court held that no Miranda was needed if the following could be proven: the questions were reasonably necessary for a legitimate jail purpose and that they were not a pretext to gather incriminating information.

The court held that both factors were present here. The court found that it was reasonable to house rival gang members separately.

The court found the pretext issue was covered because there was no reason to believe the deputy was gathering incriminating information. The deputy was not involved in the investigation of the carjacking and that he asked questions in the booking process that were on a standard form by a booking officer.


It is pretty clear that a patrol officer will not be able fall back on the Gomez decision. If patrol officers or detectives wish to gather gang information it has to be during the detention phase or during an arrest and with a valid Miranda waiver.

Chuck Gillingham is a veteran prosecutor. He is also an instructor for the California District Attorneys’ Association and for Santa Clara University School of Law. Please consult with your own legal counsel for precise guidance before applying any of the techniques or suggestions in this article.



  • Effective teaching teams! The presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda
  • This training provided the useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS
  • Your training has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department
  • This training by far has been the most informative and most effective I've attended. The instructors engaged the students in a manner that made me want to speak my opinion, ask questions, and participate.

    —Julio Ibarra, Merced County Sheriff’s Office
  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department
  • The information presented was highly relevant to my job and was presented in a manner that was organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin
  • It not often that you go to a training that you really, really want to pay attention to. Because of the high quality information and style of presentation, I knew that if I looked away I was going to miss out.

    —Quinten Graves, Oregon State Police
  • Instructional style is engaging and highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator
  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department
  • Incredible training with amazing real world instruction. I have been taking law enforcement classes for over 30 years and by far this is the best presented and most useful.

    —Det. Brian Dale, Portland Police Bureau
  • Your training gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department
  • This was, by far and away the best training I have received in 15 plus years of Law Enforcement. The instructors are experienced, engaging, articulate, and very entertaining. I will be recommending this training to multiple agencies.

    —Mark Paynter, Oregon DOC
  • This was, by far, one of the most useful training classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department