SKIP TO CONTENT
We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.
  • Celebrating 20 Years of Training Excellence 2004-2024

The Importance of Positive Reinforcement

Imagine if your boss asked you to do an unpleasant task and never bothered to thank you for doing it. What if your spouse did the same thing to you over and over again? You probably wouldn’t like that very much and resentment would start to build. When we interview subjects who are reluctant to tell the truth out of fear of the consequenc

es, we are faced with a similar predicament. If they begin to relent and start to tell bits of the truth, we must acknowledge that with positive reinforcement. If we don’t, there is absolutely no incentive for them to continue being truthful.

For example, we were interviewing a subject who we believed had intentionally poisoned her 5 year old son by giving him an overdose of his hyperactive medication. She repeatedly refused having even been home during the “accidental ingestion” of the pills. This subject made her first significant admission by admitting to giving her son double the dose of his medication (two pills instead of one) on the date in question. Even though we knew this was not true and contradicted the medical evidence, it was a significant admission none the less. It demonstrated a willingness on the subject’s part to move closer toward a confession. This, of course, is exactly what we wanted!

The response we gave her went something like this: “Thank you Jane. We know that must have been very difficult for you to tell us and we appreciate your honesty.” This response affirms the subject’s behavior and encourages more behavior of the same nature. It would have been a drastic mistake to tell her what we were really thinking: “Hey Jane, do you think we’re stupid? There’s no way your son ended up in the hospital by taking two of those pills. Now stop lying to us and start telling the truth!”

We must monitor our gut instinct

and choose the response that will further our ability to reach our goal – the TRUTH! Stifling your first inclination and choosing the response that will further your endeavor is a measured, conscious decision. We must look for little ways to affirm the subject and provide her with the positive reinforcement necessary to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!

 

Paul and Enrique have been team teaching Interviewing & Interrogation together since 1997. They are the principals of Third Degree Communications, Inc.

  • Incredible training with amazing real world instruction. I have been taking law enforcement classes for over 30 years and by far this is the best presented and most useful.

    —Det. Brian Dale, Portland Police Bureau
  • It not often that you go to a training that you really, really want to pay attention to. Because of the high quality information and style of presentation, I knew that if I looked away I was going to miss out.

    —Quinten Graves, Oregon State Police
  • This was, by far, one of the most useful training classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department
  • Instructional style is engaging and highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator
  • Your training gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department
  • This was, by far and away the best training I have received in 15 plus years of Law Enforcement. The instructors are experienced, engaging, articulate, and very entertaining. I will be recommending this training to multiple agencies.

    —Mark Paynter, Oregon DOC
  • The information presented was highly relevant to my job and was presented in a manner that was organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin
  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department
  • This training by far has been the most informative and most effective I've attended. The instructors engaged the students in a manner that made me want to speak my opinion, ask questions, and participate.

    —Julio Ibarra, Merced County Sheriff’s Office
  • Your training has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department
  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department
  • This training provided the useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS
  • Effective teaching teams! The presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda